|
If I hear the term ‘wowser’ or the phrase ‘nanny state’ again, I’m going to scream.
Last week in The West Australian (and as a former West Australian, yes, I am equipped to comment), Perth Lord Mayor Lisa Scaffidi claimed that liquor licensing restrictions are "strangling the city” and inhibiting its growth.
“I cannot believe the fact there are now restrictions on the sale of energy drinks!" Ms Scaffidi said.
Ms Scaffidi, that would be because a recent US study found that patrons consuming alcohol mixed with energy drinks are at greater risk of harm through drink driving, violence, and unsafe sex. This study contributes to a growing body of literature indicating that mixing energy drinks and alcohol has negative health and safety consequences in young adults.
There’s more though.
Ms Scaffidi also says that steps to force some Northbridge pubs and clubs to close early could contribute to antisocial behaviour, rather than curb it.
Well, that’s easily refuted. Australian research has shown that extended trading hours for licensed premises (from as little as one to two hours) can increases violent assaults in and around premises by up to 70%.
The article goes on to say that “In WA’s nanny state, there is no having a quiet drink on Australia Day.”
Let’s face it – WA’s drinking culture is not one of ‘quiet drinks’. Who can forget the mini riot on South Perth’s foreshore back in 2004? By why are we punished, people bleat, for the actions of a few?
That would be because the bulk of alcohol related harm can be attributed to the majority of the population who are moderate drinkers whom binge drink on occasion. It can not be attributed to heavy drinkers who constitute a distinct minority.
The evidence is clear: the most reliable and cost effective way reduce alcohol related harm, including violence, is to reduce the supply of alcohol. If anyone has evidence to the contrary, I’d love to hear from you.
Until next week,
Sarah Jaggard
Community Mobilisation Policy Officer
|