|
I’ve been bought up as a believer in the prevention paradox; that the majority of alcohol related problems are caused by the majority of the population, who tend to drink in moderation but binge on occasion. And as such, I’ve always been a strong advocate for whole-of-population strategies to reduce alcohol related harm.
So I find it fascinating that there’s renewed interest in strategies which target individual drinkers.
For example, WA police are now able to issue barring notices to patrons behaving in a disorderly manner, potentially banning them from one or more venues for up to a year.
WA police and the State Government are hoping new legislation will put a stop to a rise in anti-social behaviour on licensed premises, with WA's Police Commissioner Karl O'Callaghan saying that individualised drinker bans are in response to community sentiment against blanket provisions that target everyone.
Similar legislation also exists in Victoria, NSW, and the NT.
The AHA supports the legislation, claiming that it’s a significant initiative that targets a small group of individuals who cause the majority of problems. I’m thinking the industry would also be supportive, given that these kinds of strategies have little effect on sales of alcohol and puts responsibility back on the consumer.
However, others have criticised the move, saying that strategies that target individual drinkers do not address the cause of the problem, which is binge drinking.
Another concern is that such strategies could be misused and may result in discrimination.
And finally, do individual bans serve only to displace people and problems?
There’s very little evidence to support individual bans as a strategy. In conjunction with population based measures, however…well, we’ll just have to wait and see.
Until next week,
Sarah Jaggard
Community Mobilisation Policy Officer
|